057). A lower probability was observed for IDUs (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.36–0.73). Similar to the analysis of late diagnosis, the transmission groups showed characteristic evolutions of risk over time (Fig. 4). In 2001, the probability of late presentation for care was lowest for

IDUs and increased steadily from 45% to almost 60% in 2009 in this subgroup. In contrast, the probability of late presentation decreased markedly in MSM from over 60% in 2001 to approximately 45% in 2009 and remained somewhat stable in migrants and heterosexuals, who had similar evolutions and would overlap in Figure 4. Patients with unknown transmission risk had no significant interaction with date of diagnosis. Female heterosexuals (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46–0.75)

and female migrants (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54–0.97) had lower probabilities of late presentation for care Dasatinib solubility dmso compared with their male counterparts. Late presentation is associated with a substantially higher risk of mortality and morbidity. The risk increases with lower CD4 cell counts at ART initiation and remains elevated even years after initiation of ART [13, 14]. This argues for early diagnosis and treatment of HIV infection, before patients enter advanced stages of immunodeficiency. In contrast to many developing countries, access to HIV testing selleck compound and treatment currently is not limited by economic constraints in industrialized countries such as Germany. As a basis for targeted interventions, we tried to identify Sitaxentan groups at risk for late diagnosis and care in a specialized treatment centre in this setting. Data sources were chosen with a view to data completeness and generalizability, and represent different time-points. Data from the national case surveillance provide representative data on the first HIV diagnosis, whereas the ClinSurv cohort provides data on the

first presentation in specialized HIV treatment centres representing almost complete data for approximately 20% of all treated HIV-infected patients in Germany. According to the national case surveillance, in the years 2001–2010 a significant number of patients (49.5%; 95% CI 48.7–50.3%), on first being diagnosed with HIV infection, met the new consensus definition of late presentation. This proportion remained relatively stable over the years and no clear trend towards an earlier presentation in more recent years was noted. Despite intensive efforts to encourage earlier testing, this situation is currently also found in other European countries [20], although most studies have not yet started to use the new cut-off of 350 cells/μL for the definition of late presentation [21]. With regard to the transmission risk, the proportion of late presenters for diagnosis remained steady for heterosexuals. Migrants from high-prevalence countries according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition [22] were the group with the highest proportion of patients with late diagnosis.