, 2007). If error cannot

be avoided (e.g., if all available samples were obtained post-fast), it is important to assess accuracy of exposure characterization by calculating sensitivities and specificities (Jurek et al., 2006). Sensitivity LY294002 concentration is the probability of correctly classifying an individual as having high level of exposure, if that person truly belongs in the high exposure category. Specificity is the probability of correctly assigning low exposure to a participant who truly has a low level of exposure. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity may be calculated for a single urine sample, using multiple samples per subject as gold standard, since the true sensitivity and specificity for many measures JQ1 mouse is unknown. This can be achieved by randomly selecting a single sample from among each individual’s repeated samples collected over the study (as demonstrated for phthalates in Adibi et al., 2008). In a recent systematic review of the epidemiology literature on phthalates and associations with obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, Goodman et al. (2014) found that of 26 available studies, all but three relied on a single

measure of phthalates. Similarly, in a systematic review of BPA and obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, LaKind et al. (2014) found that of 45 available studies, all but four relied on a single measure of BPA. Yet the intra-individual variability for BPA is large (with ICCs ranging from 0.10 to 0.35) (Lassen et al., 2013 and Teitelbaum et al., 2008), and multiple measures of exposure are needed to describe a person’s long-term exposure. The ICCs for phthalates have been reported to be higher than for BPA (e.g., ICC values range

from 0.18 to 0.61 for mono-ethyl phthalate, from 0.21 to 0.51 for mono-isobutyl phthalate, and from 0.08 to 0.27 for mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [reviewed in Goodman et al., 2014]), but intra-person variability Methamphetamine is still large. Recently, Attfield et al. (2014), in a study of variability of urinary pesticide measures in children, observed that a study with only a small number of samples from each study participant “…may lead to a high probability of exposure misclassification by incorrect quantile assignment and offer little assurance for correctly classifying the exposure into a specific category. The above considerations permit dividing the available body of literature into the following tiers (Table 1). Tier 1 includes studies in which exposure assessment is based on sufficient number of samples per individual to estimate exposure over the appropriate duration, or through the use of adequate long-term sampling (e.g., multiple 24-hour urine collections). To be included in Tier 1, studies should assess error by calculating measures of accuracy (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) and reliability (e.g., ICC). It is possible that for some chemicals, one sample may be sufficient to fully characterize exposure.