3% versus 22.6%, P = 0.0042; median PFS 9.2 months versus 7.5 months; HR = 0.73, P = 0.017) and partially sensitive disease with median

PFS of 7.4 months versus 5.5 months in PLD/TRAB versus PLD arm (HR = 0.65, P = 0.0152). An unplanned hypothesis-generating analysis adjusting for the PFI imbalance and other prognostic factors suggested an improvement in OS associated with the trabectedin/PLD arm (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69–0.98; P = 0.0285). In another unplanned exploratory analysis, the subset of patients with a PFI of 6–12 months Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical had the largest difference in OS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47–0.86; P = 0.0027). Data showed a longer time to the following platinum therapy, and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical this imbalance in platinum-free interval was suggested as a possible cause of the increased OS [78]. Thus, these data suggest that the treatment with an effective nonplatinum combination may artificially prolong the platinum-free interval giving more chance of activity to further platinum therapy. This hypothesis will be investigated in a phase III trial, called INNOVATYION. As expected the combination Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical regimen of TRAB/PLD has been associated to a

greater haematological toxicity (grade 3/4 anaemia 14%, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia 63%). Among other toxicities, short-lived grade 3/4 hypertransaminasemia (38%) and HFS were documented in 4% of the PLD/TRAB arm compared to 20% in the PLD alone arm [79]. In September 2009, based on these results, which support the PLD/TRAB combination as the most effective nonplatinum-based combination in platinum-sensitive disease, the PLD (30mg/m2) and TRAB (1.1mg/m2) association every 3 weeks has Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical been approved by the EMA for treatment of patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive OvCa [80]. Based on the phase-II trials in platinum-sensitive OvCa the combination of PLD/carboplatin has Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical been explored in phase-III trials [53]. Markman et al. compared single-agent carboplatin to

its combination with PLD in recurrent ovarian cancer, showing a statistically significant improvement of PFS with carboplatin/PLD, without an overall survival benefit. Interestingly, for unknown reasons, the association drastically reduced the rate of hypersensitivity reactions compared to carboplatin alone (9% versus 0%, P = 0.0008) [53]. Later on the results of the CALYPSO trial have been reported [81, 82]. This international open-label phase-III trial compared carboplatin Edoxaban PLD (CD) with carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). A total of 976 recurrent patients relapsing >6 months after first- or second-line therapy were randomized to receive CD or CP for six cycles. Designed as a noninferiority trial, CALYPSO Daporinad nmr demonstrated that the combination of CD was not only noninferior to CP in terms of PFS, but indeed it was more effective (HR = 0.82, P = 0.005) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.