However, in the AL individual PNs, and therefore, by necessity, inhibitory interneurons, may switch allegiance between different synchronously spiking groups (Wehr and Laurent, 1996). Similar dynamic changes in the composition of synchronous groups of neurons Dolutegravir ic50 have also been observed in other systems
(Riehle et al., 1997). Networks that possess a unique coloring do not permit such dynamics. To circumvent this difficulty we constructed networks with multiple colorings. For example, the graph in Figure 3B possesses chromatic number three. One of the four nodes is not connected to either the red or the blue node. Therefore, two colorings, one where this group is colored red and the other where it is colored blue, are permissible colorings of the graph. A dynamical consequence of this “structural ambiguity” is shown in Figure 3C. The group that may be colored either red or blue is able to switch allegiance to spike synchronously with Bcl-2 inhibitor both the red and the blue group while remaining silent
when the green group of neurons is activated. Based on our formalism, complex dynamics observed in vivo in the insect AL (Laurent et al., 1996) and other neuronal networks can thus be attributed to its structure—a network with multiple colorings permits transient synchrony in overlapping groups of neurons. The coloring of a purely inhibitory network provides a strong constraint on its dynamics. However, many biological networks, including the olfactory system, include populations of
excitatory neurons as well. To explore the consequences of implementing excitatory neurons, we constructed a network containing excitatory and inhibitory neurons with random connections between them (connection probability = 0.5) (Bazhenov et al., 2001b) (Figure 4A). This network was previously proposed as a model of locust AL dynamics (Assisi et al., 2007, Bazhenov et al., 2001a, Bazhenov et al., 2001b and Bazhenov et al., 2005). We found that the coloring-based dynamics was not compromised by the addition of excitatory neurons (Figure 4B), but was rather strengthened. The spike coherence within individual cycles of Histone demethylase the oscillatory field potential (mean activity) increased significantly when excitation was added (Figure 4C). The mechanism of synchronization of PNs and LNs can be understood by considering a single reciprocally connected pair. When reciprocally coupled, the LNs and PNs oscillate in antiphase. A Na+ spike generated by a PN elicits an EPSP in the LN, which in turn generates a spike that delays the onset of a subsequent PN spike. The frequency of the resulting oscillations is controlled by the duration and the amplitude of the IPSP (see Bazhenov et al., 2001b, Figure 2). When a single LN projects to many postsynaptic PNs, it equally delays and synchronizes spikes in those PNs.