In Florida, Puerto Rico, and the USVI, data indicate that scraping and breakage caused by derelict lobster traps were most common on gorgonians and sponges, followed by coral species

( Sheridan et al., 2005). Water depth and wind speed also affect trap movement and habitat impact. For example, in the USVI, traps in shallow water moved between 20 and 155 m from original locations after a hurricane passed near the study site, while traps in deeper waters were less likely to move long distances ( Clark et al., 2012). These findings suggest that coastal and marine habitats could benefit from targeted removal programs as well as expanded research on the movement and behavior of DFTs in different physical environments. There can be some positive impacts of DFTs, such as when the trap stops ghost C646 price fishing, becomes colonized by benthic communities, and blends into the surrounding seafloor habitat.

Traps at each site demonstrated that quite a bit of fouling occurs within a few months to a year and includes diverse marine communities that utilize traps as substrate (Fig. 4). In the USVI, six species of fish (n = 384) were observed grazing on the fouling community of DFTs ( Clark et al., 2012). In North Carolina, oysters recruited to 17% of the retrieved traps, and several traps had become part of the surrounding habitat ( Voss et al., 2012) ( Fig. 4b). In Virginia, 868 of the nearly 32,000 recovered traps had significant oyster growth, including some traps with over PI3K inhibitor 100 oysters ( Bilkovic et al., 2014). DFTs may also serve as refuges for some species like spiny lobsters in the USVI ( Fig. 4c). It is hard to estimate the importance of DFTs as additional hard substrate,

but if DFTs are providing substrate to a diverse marine community, management schemes may consider rendering the traps inactive and leaving them to act as habitat Meloxicam if removing them would cause more destruction than benefit. It is clear from this synthesis that there are important gaps in our scientific knowledge of the impacts of DFTs. There are also important variations in local or regional regulations that impact DFTs. A few policies attempt to limit loss by regulating where fishing can occur, such as those in the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland where blue crab fishing is only allowed in the main stem of the Chesapeake. Other fisheries have requirements designed to limit how long a trap is likely to continue to fish once it becomes derelict. In the Dungeness crab fishery, for example, trap exits are required to be closed with rot cord, which decays and allows exit doors to open in approximately six months, limiting the amount of time that lost traps will remain fishing (AK Department of Fish and Game, 2012). As the data presented here suggest, however, even with preventative policies ghost fishing remains a widespread, complex, and spatially variable challenge for which there is not likely to be a single solution.