Our results satisfy all three of these criteria, so interpreting the activity in the FOF as “movement preparation” is, at least, consistent with prior work. There are several possible interpretations as to what component(s) of response preparation FOF neurons

might encode: do they represent a motor plan? A memory of the identity of the motor plan? Attention? Intention? (Bisley and Goldberg, 2010, Glimcher, 2003, Goldman-Rakic et al., 1992, Schall, 2001, Thompson et al., 2005 and Gold Cabozantinib purchase and Shadlen, 2001). Our data do not discriminate between these possibilities. Nevertheless, we conclude that, as in the primate, there exists in the rat frontal cortex a structure that is involved in the preparation and/or planning of orienting responses. An area with such a role may be conserved across multiple species, including birds (Knudsen et al., 1995). Since FOF delay period firing rates are better correlated with the upcoming motor act than with the initial sensory cue (Figure 4), our data do indicate that FOF neurons are not likely to encode a memory of the auditory stimulus itself. Furthermore, in memory trials, some form of memory is required immediately after the end of the auditory instruction stimulus. We did not observe

a short-latency sensory response in the FOF, but instead observed a slow and gradual development of choice-dependent activity during the delay period. This suggests that FOF neurons do not support the early memory the task requires. The FOF is strongly interconnected with the posterior PF-06463922 molecular weight Vasopressin Receptor parietal cortex (PPC) (Reep and Corwin, 2009 and Nakamura, 1999) and with the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC, Condé et al., 1995). We suggest both of these areas as candidates for supporting the early memory aspects of

the task, perhaps even including the transformation from a continuous auditory signal (click-rate) to a binary choice (plan-left/plan-right). Based on data from an orienting task driven by olfactory stimuli, Felsen and Mainen (2008) recently proposed that the superior colliculus (SC) may play a broad role in sensory-guided orienting. Projections to the SC from the FOF (Leonard, 1969, Künzle et al., 1976 and Reep et al., 1987), together with our current data, suggest that the FOF may be an important contributor to orienting-related activity in the SC. As in the primate, orienting behavior in the rodent is likely to be subserved by a network of interacting brain areas. The relative roles and mutual interactions between the FOF, PPC, mPFC, and SC (and possibly other areas, including the basal ganglia) during orienting behaviors in the rat remain to be elucidated. We focused our analyses here on the response-selective delay period activity of FOF neurons.