) pneumophila is the cause of more than 95% of LD cases [3, 4] H

) pneumophila is the cause of more than 95% of LD cases [3, 4]. High concentrations (104-1010 Legionella CFU/L) of Legionella in the water sources are considered a risk of infection [5–8]. Being able to determine the concentration of Legionella in water is, therefore, highly relevant in risk assessments and transmission tracing. The reference method for enumeration of Legionella in water is culture [9]. Culture is, however, hampered by a long incubation time (7 to 10 days) whereas qPCR can be performed within three hours.

By culture, only bacteria cultivable under the given conditions can be quantified in environmental samples with mixed cultures of different bacteria including different Legionella species. Quantitative detection of L. pneumophila (which is the most Thiazovivin significant Legionella species for risk assessment) is difficult BAY 80-6946 order by culture. In qPCR, with specific L. pneumophila primers, only L. pneumophila will be amplified irrespectively of background flora etc. The important bias of qPCR compared to culture is that also dead and otherwise Anlotinib purchase not culturable Legionella will be quantified. The aim of this work was to clarify under which circumstances and in which samples qPCR is useful for monitoring and risk assessment. The investigation was performed in a newly built residential

area where two males contracted LD. Methods The sampling area and the interventions A newly built residential area associated with two cases was investigated [10]. The area consisted of 225 apartments distributed on 6 blocks; around 210 apartments were inhabited at the time of the sampling period. The two cases and the interventions done

to overcome the Legionella colonisation and the risk factors found to be associated with the residential area were published GNAT2 previously [10]. Two interventions were conducted to control the Legionella contamination of the hot water system. The first was a 12 h heat treatment of the boilers (approximately 70°C) together with a request to all residents to flush their taps for 5 minutes. Subsequently, the water in the boilers was completely replaced with fresh water and the temperature was lowered to 60°C. Circulation pumps were set at maximum flow. As the first intervention did not reduce the Legionella count satisfactorily, a second intervention was performed three weeks later, which consisted of an increase of the water temperature in the boilers to approximately 70°C for 24 hours. During this time, all taps were flushed for 5 min. The boilers were hyperchlorinated and the temperature was set at 65°C. All shower hoses were replaced with new ones in all apartments, and over the next month the boiler temperature was regulated to ensure that the water in the most distant taps was kept at > 50°C. Taps of empty apartments were flushed weekly for 5 min with water from the hot water taps.

Comments are closed.