Results: The survey was completed by 783 subjects.
The five most important factors were limited walking (p < 0.05), activity-related pain (p < 0.05), constant pain (p < 0.05), difficulty with prolonged standing (p = 0.754), and inability to do one’s job or housework (p = 0.995). Shoe-related CA4P issues and foot and ankle weakness were significantly different between the sexes. Constant pain, inability to play sports, inability to participate in a job or housework, and recurrent foot or ankle skin sores or infections were significantly different between age groups. Between 38% and 50% of the outcome points found on two commonly used foot and ankle instruments included factors not of primary importance to the patient.
Conclusions: There are sex and age-related differences regarding outcome factors following the treatment of disorders affecting the foot and ankle. As many as 50% of the factors in currently used foot and ankle outcome instruments are not of primary importance to patients.”
“The aim of this paper was to examine the extent to which underage drinking clusters geographically in a sample of communities, and to investigate the manner in which community-level contexts are related MDV3100 in vitro to this process.
We used data from a randomized community trial of underage drinking to provide the first quantitative estimates of the magnitude of the geographic clustering of underage drinking based upon pairwise odds ratios (PWORs). The Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws Randomized Community Trial provided data from repeated cross-sectional samples of youth aged 14-20 from 68 communities surveyed in 2004, 2006, and 2007 (n = 18.730). Past 30-day drinking, binge drinking, getting drunk, experiencing non-violent consequences as a result of drinking and making a purchase attempt all significantly clustered within-communities
with PWORs ranging from 1.05 to 1.21. After adjustment for individual-level characteristics, results remained relatively unchanged. However, there was evidence that the magnitude of the clustering varied as a function learn more of neighborhood disadvantage, neighborhood disorder, and family structure. Clustering of drunkenness and experiencing non-violent consequences as a result of drinking was greatest in the least economically disadvantaged and least disordered communities with the greatest percentage of married-couple families. The clustering of making a purchase attempt, however, was greatest in more disordered communities. specifically the largest communities with the highest degree of residential mobility and housing density. These findings that clustering of underage drinking behaviors varies by community context has the potential for identifying the types of communities to target for underage drinking behavior-specific preventive interventions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.