This paper seeks to address this gap. The paper reports on one element of a broader study which set out to investigate issues of choice and decision making in end of life care (EOLC) from the perspective of patients, their family members and HCPs involved in their care. One of the key objectives in our study related to the Preferred Place of Care (PPCa) tool. This originated as part of a District Nurse education programme [15-17] to encourage discussion of ACP. The study aimed to explore if, when and how PPC was used to facilitate conversations about patients’ preferences (for place Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of care and death) and how these were documented. Discussion

and recording of these preferences is seen as an important means of supporting and enabling

patient choice, currently a central aspect of EOLC policy in England [18]. PPC is one of three interventions that were rolled out in England in the first phase of the National End of Life Care Programme between 2004–2007. In addition, the Gold Standards Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Framework was developed as a grass roots initiative to improve palliative care within primary care Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical settingsb. The Liverpool Care Pathway is an integrated care pathway used at the bedside to deliver sustained quality of care for the dying in the last hours and days of lifec. The End of Life Care Strategy (EOLCS) for England Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical [19] was published in 2008. This further emphasised the government’s core commitment to making excellent EOLC universally available through the realisation of patient choice about the manner and, particularly, the place of dying. It sets out an EOLC Pathway, the first step of which highlights that discussions about, and recording of, preferences for future care

between CYC202 manufacturer people approaching the end of life, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical their family members and health and social care staff are central to the delivery of good EOLC. ACP was highlighted as a key area within the Strategy and it has subsequently become more clearly defined in policy and guidanced[19,20]. ACP has been defined as a ‘voluntary process of discussion and review to help an individual Bay 11-7085 who has capacity to anticipate how their condition may affect them in the future and, if they wish, set on record: choices about their care and treatment and / or an advance decision to refuse a treatment in specific circumstances, so that these can be referred to by those responsible for their care or treatment (whether professional staff or family carers) in the event that they lose capacity to decide once their illness progresses’ [20]. The EOLC Strategy has identified the lack of open communication between people approaching the end of life, their family members and health and social care staff as one of the key barriers to the delivery of good EOLC. Poor communication about EOLC is a common and enduring complaint [21].